Skip to content

In-Depth Review: Nokia 7.1 – A Mid-Range Contender

Nokia 7.1

Introduction

The Nokia 7.1, released in October 2018, was positioned as a mid-range smartphone offering a blend of premium design, solid performance, and a clean Android experience. As part of HMD Global’s revival of the Nokia brand, the 7.1 aimed to deliver a stock Android experience with timely updates, making it a strong competitor in its price segment. This review will cover its hardware, software, performance, and how it stacks up against rivals.


Hardware Specifications

Design & Build

  • Dimensions: 149.7 x 71.2 x 8 mm
  • Weight: 160g
  • Build: Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), glass back, aluminum frame
  • Colors: Gloss Midnight Blue, Gloss Steel
  • Water Resistance: No official IP rating

The Nokia 7.1 features a sleek glass-and-metal design, giving it a premium look despite its mid-range positioning. The phone feels sturdy, though the glass back is prone to fingerprints and minor scratches.

Display

  • Type: IPS LCD, HDR10 support
  • Size: 5.84 inches
  • Resolution: 1080 x 2280 pixels (~432 PPI)
  • Aspect Ratio: 19:9
  • Notch: Yes (small top-notch)

The HDR10-compliant display is one of the highlights, offering vibrant colors and good brightness levels. The Full HD+ resolution ensures sharp visuals, though OLED competitors may offer deeper blacks.

Performance

  • Chipset: Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
  • CPU: Octa-core (4×1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4×1.6 GHz Kryo 260 Silver)
  • GPU: Adreno 509
  • RAM: 3GB / 4GB variants
  • Storage: 32GB / 64GB, expandable via microSD (up to 400GB)

The Snapdragon 636 provides decent performance for everyday tasks but struggles with heavy gaming. The 4GB RAM variant is preferable for smoother multitasking.

Camera

  • Rear Cameras:
    • 12 MP (f/1.8, 1.28µm, PDAF, Zeiss optics)
    • 5 MP depth sensor (f/2.4)
  • Features: Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama
  • Video Recording: 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps
  • Front Camera: 8 MP (f/2.0, 1.12µm), 1080p@30fps

The Zeiss-branded cameras produce good daylight shots with accurate colors, but low-light performance is average. The depth sensor helps with portrait mode, though edge detection isn’t perfect.

Battery & Charging

  • Battery Capacity: 3060 mAh
  • Charging: 18W fast charging (Quick Charge 3.0)
  • Battery Life: Moderate (lasts a full day with light usage)

The battery is a weak point, as competitors offered larger capacities. Fast charging helps, but heavy users may need a midday top-up.

Connectivity & Ports

  • USB: USB Type-C 2.0
  • 3.5mm Jack: Yes
  • Bluetooth: 5.0
  • Wi-Fi: 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac
  • NFC: Yes
  • FM Radio: Yes

Audio

  • Single speaker (decent output)
  • No stereo speakers

Security

  • Rear-mounted fingerprint sensor (fast and reliable)
  • Face unlock (software-based, less secure)

Software Specifications

  • OS at Launch: Android 8.1 Oreo (upgradable to Android 10)
  • UI: Stock Android (Android One program)
  • Update Policy: Guaranteed monthly security updates for 3 years

The clean Android experience is a major selling point, with no bloatware and timely updates. However, the phone is no longer supported with major OS upgrades.


Comparison with Competitors

FeatureNokia 7.1Xiaomi Redmi Note 7Motorola Moto G7Samsung Galaxy A50 (2019)
Display5.84″ IPS LCD, HDR106.3″ IPS LCD6.2″ IPS LCD6.4″ Super AMOLED
ProcessorSnapdragon 636Snapdragon 660Snapdragon 632Exynos 9610
RAM/Storage3/4GB + 32/64GB3/4GB + 32/64GB4GB + 64GB4/6GB + 64/128GB
Rear Camera12MP + 5MP (Zeiss)48MP + 5MP12MP + 5MP25MP + 8MP + 5MP
Battery3060 mAh (18W charging)4000 mAh (18W charging)3000 mAh (15W)4000 mAh (15W)
SoftwareAndroid One (Stock)MIUI (Custom)Near-stock AndroidOne UI (Custom)
Price (2019)~$350~$200~$300~$350

Key Takeaways:

  • The Nokia 7.1 stood out for its premium build and stock Android experience but lagged in battery life and raw performance.
  • The Redmi Note 7 offered better specs (SD 660, 48MP camera, larger battery) at a lower price but had MIUI bloatware.
  • The Moto G7 was a close competitor with near-stock Android but weaker specs.
  • The Galaxy A50 had a superior AMOLED display and better chipset but a higher price.

Pros & Cons

Pros:

  • Premium glass-and-metal design
  • Clean Android One experience with timely updates
  • HDR10 display for better multimedia consumption
  • Decent camera performance in daylight
  • Expandable storage

Cons:

  • Below-average battery life
  • Snapdragon 636 struggles with heavy tasks
  • No water resistance
  • Low-light camera performance is mediocre

Final Verdict

The Nokia 7.1 was a well-rounded mid-ranger with a strong emphasis on design and software. While it couldn’t match rivals in raw power or battery life, its stock Android experience and build quality made it a compelling choice for users prioritizing a clean interface and reliability. Today, it remains a decent secondary device but is outclassed by modern budget phones.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *